Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
KMID : 0917520030100030065
Journal of Speech Sciences
2003 Volume.10 No. 3 p.65 ~ p.78
The Effects of a Sibling-involoved Language Intervention in Children with Language Disorders


Abstract
This study was aimed at clarifying the effects of sibling-involved language intervention in children with language disorders. Ten subjects were selected an assigned into two groups (language intervention group with sibling-involvement, a language intervention without sibling-involvement). Group 1 consisted of 5 children with language disorders. Group 2 consisted of 5 children with language disorders without sibling-involvement. To investigate the language and communication ability, Picture Vocabulary est. and the subjects¢¥s spontaneous speech sample were analyzed. To compare pre-treatment with post-treatment between two the groups, repeated-measures ANOVA and t-test were used. The results were as follows; First, the language intervention with sibling-involvement was not effective compared to without sibling-involvement in improving the picture vocabulary ability of children with language disorders. There was a significant difference between pre-treatment and post-treatment in the picture vocabulary ability of the two groups. However, there was no significant difference in the post-trearment between the two groups. Second, the language intervention with sibling involvement was more effective compared to without sibling-involvement in improving the semantic aspects of language of children with language disorders. There was a significant difference between per-treatment and post-treatment in the number of semantic elations between the two groups in that group 1 showed a higher improvement than group 2. Third, the language intervention with sibling involvement was more effective in improving pragmatic aspects of language of children with language disorders. There was a significant difference between pre-treatment and post-treatment in the number of communicative intentions of the two groups. And there was a significant difference in the post-treatment between the groups in that group 1 showed a higher improvement than group 2.
KEYWORD
FullTexts / Linksout information
Listed journal information